Report about torture in Brazil finds relevancy of UN work, but lack of implementation
- Henrique Napoleão Alves

- Aug 31, 2021
- 2 min read
Updated: Nov 7, 2022
A new report by Facts and Norms Institute has identified how different thematic reports of the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture can apply to Brazil.

Image: Adrien Olichon / Unsplash
In June 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture invited States, civil society actors and other stakeholders to a round of written consultations. The aim was to identigy the impact, if any, of recent thematic reports by the UN.
Facts and Norms Institute (FNI) responded to the call through a concerted effort of its recently innaugurated Global Human Rights Observatory.
The resulting analysis, "Impact of Thematic Reports presented by the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture: input to the UN regarding Brazil", considers eight UN thematic reports with topics ranging from the extra-custodial use of force, to migration-related torture, and psychological torture.
Prepared by FNI's principal researcher Henrique Napoleao Alves, the report also address strengthening the prohibition of torture and how States can cooperate with the mandate of the Special Rapporteur.
The preparatory works included consultations with international expert Thais Lemos Duarte, a former staff member of Brazil's National Mechanism for the Prevention and Combat of Torture.
No observable impact
In discussing the relevancy of each thematic report to Brazil, the report draws upon a wide variety of primary and secondary sources, including journal articles, reports from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, case law from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, concluding observations from the United Nations treaty bodies and government websites.
It looks at each thematic report and discusses how relevant it was to the national context, and if any of the recommendations had an impact on domestic procedures, including national case law and legislation.
A commonality with each thematic report is despite addressing topics important to the national context, there was no reference to them found in any domestic documents.
This is concerning, as the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on Torture includes making recommendations to prevent and eradicate torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Major relevance
Despite not being mentioned by national documents, the UN reports are all relevant to the Brazilian context, as summarized by the following table:
The importance of the social agenda
FNI's report to the United Nations emphasizes the importance of the social agenda to walk side-by-side with tackling torture in Brazil. In the concluding words of the report:
"Human rights violations guard a close connection to longstanding social exclusion and the denial of economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights."
"Class, gender and ethno-racial discrimination impose a greater exposure to violence."
"The past work of the UN was once described as having a focus on torture as a “crime of opportunity”, i.e., one which is committed when the opportunity arises.
In this sense, if the State creates a regular system of visits to prisons, for example, this could function as a way of impeding the conjunction of situations that make the violation possible.
Of course, such a system of visits can play an important role, and so can other similar lines of action. However, effective prevention of torture mostly depends on tackling the factors behind class, race and gender inequalities."
For more news and updates, please subscribe at the subscription box below.




Comments